I have tried to fathom the mystery of the needs of meaning and existence of the infinite with what I understand, and feel as you prefer logic. Then I came across the "wall of infinity" - the border, which can not be exceeded.
Why "Wall of infinity? Well, even if I set up all variants of the most optimistic answers to fundamental questions, it inevitably came across the problem of infinity or not. Let us assume that after the death of our consciousness does not disappear but continues its existence in this or another world. From the perspective of my goals and needs, such as a human existence seems meaningless. Assuming the need for change, new experiences, new knowledge and a deeper understanding, we can probably say that depending on the amount of knowledge to gather, things to see whether the problems to be solved may be that either there are endless, and if any action does not have the long-term sense (like playing a game, which can not be completed), or is their limited number, and then - assuming the eternal existence - after all, is no longer anything interesting or new to learn or do (see the end of the main thread of the game). It is my opinion, two basic models of infinite existence. As for finite existence, that is, ending the cessation of existence, it seems, unfortunately, it is more logical as saying "everything has its end." Of course, the prospects for long enough to okalała all of such existence, and this scenario appears to be meaningless, particularly in terms of conscious being, which, irrespective of their activities, their achievements and their choices disappear forever.
wrote, however, that I look at from the standpoint of man, 'here and now. " Why did that to find meaning, assuming that death is received by us to the need for continuous learning and development, the need for change? But the duration for the same period that gave any sense of infinite existence in all its continuity? Let us go further in this direction - wherewith the difference between "heaven" (let's say - endless happiness in the perfect duration) from the state of nonexistence? Or when there is no longer any need, in the absence of external stimuli to any action, whether it still comes a time period which is after all a measure of the change? So what is different rat with electrodes implanted into the brain giving him the full pleasure of time, resulting in a absence of any action on his part from the same rat after the suicidal death by starvation? In a word - assuming that it is the pursuit of happiness is the driving force of our actions (by the pursuit of happiness, I mean the avoidance of evil) - the duration without any change and the lack of duration seem to me to differ only by the fact become aware of the infinite of the first. Even closer to the non-existence is in my eyes, without continuance needs, in a state of lethargy, and because it completely eliminates the need for change (good example it seems to me to be here if the duration of stone was aware of).
sum infinite persistence in pursuit of happiness seems to me like a Sisyphean labor, and infinite length in a position to see the ideal of happiness as a state of apathy, comparable to the state of nonexistence. The same goes for the duration without needs. So is equal to the infinity of existence non-existence, and our lives had no chance on the "happy ending" in a very contradictory human need and the joining point of infinity of existence? Here I hit my head on "the wall of infinity." The only hope is that (probably) the logic of this text should never was created ...
